In the ever-evolving world of laptop processors, two contenders have emerged as frontrunners in the quest for ultimate performance: the Apple M4 and the Intel Core Ultra 5. As consumers and tech enthusiasts alike ponder the question of M4 vs Intel Core Ultra 5, it’s crucial to delve into the key differences and performance metrics that set these processors apart.
The next Apple chip that made its debut in May 2024 is the Apple M4, a 10-core monster with the 3nm process. The M4 boasts of the basic clock rate of 4.41 GHz for the performance cores, and 2.89 GHz for the efficient cores to allow for optimized speed and energy utilization. However, the Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, unveiled in December 2023, comes with 14 cores on board even with a 4 efficient cores/ 10 performance cores combination and was made using the 7 nm process.
Single-Core and Multi-Core Performance
When it comes to single-core performance, the M4 vs Intel Core Ultra 5 battle leans in favor of the Apple M4. Our GeekBench 6 Single-Core test result gave an M4 score of 3810; in comparison with the Core Ultra 5, the M4 attained 71% better performance. This has suggested that the M4 is going to perform well on those tasks that require lots of single core computing power such as web browsing and other basic tasks like word processing.
Yet, the roles are reversed when we compare the multi-core systems at our disposal today. In the GeekBench 6 multi-core test, howevcer, the Intel Core Ultra 5 125H with an additional core outperforms the M4. The Core Ultra 5 gained a total performance rating of 11,543 points and the M4-14,541, which means that the M4 was 26% faster than the Core Ultra 5. This implies that the Core Ultra 5 may perform better in parallel applications that dread multi-threads such as video rendering and comprehensive mechanical simulations.
Power Efficiency and Thermal Performance
One of the key aspects to consider in the M4 vs Intel Core Ultra 5 comparison is power efficiency. The Apple M4 takes its place in a 3nm manufacturing process and an ARM-based design; this chip, reputed for drawing a TDP of 10W maximum B, TDP of 20W. However, the Intel Core Ultra 5 125H range of TDP is between 20W to 65W with the maximum boost TDP of 115W.
These discrepancies have important consequences on battery life, and heat dissipation. The M4 model the lower power consumption which leads to increase battery life and it is preferred for portable devices. Moreover, M4 has a lower TDP and therefore cooler operation – it can lead to completely noiseless and more efficient coolers.
Integrated Graphics Performance
The integrated graphic solutions of both the Apple M4 and the Intel Core Ultra 5 125H are present in them. The M4 has Apple M4 GPU and Core Ultra 5 has Intel Arc Graphics with core count of 7. In general, the raw FLOPS count is higher on the M4 GPU at 4.1 TFLOPS to the Arc Graphics’ 3.94 TFLOPS.
However, it must be noted that FLOPS alone can give us a picture of the entire graphics capability. There are always specific factors, which include driver optimization, memory bandwidth, or architectural differences, that can dramatically affect real-world performance. As such, the M4 vs Intel Core Ultra 5 graphics comparison may vary depending on the specific workload and software optimizations.
Memory Support and Bandwidth
Another crucial aspect to consider in the M4 vs Intel Core Ultra 5 showdown is memory support. The Apple M4 has the facility to incorporate up to 24GB LPDDR5X-7500 memory in quad-channel, with a max memory band width of 120 GB/sec. On the other hand, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H has better Memory types supported Feature which includes LPDDR5-7467 MHz, LPDDR5x-7467 MHz and DDR5-5600 Mhz which has a Memory Max: 96 GB, Dual channel.
Compared to the Core Ultra 5, the M4 has a quad-channel DIMM interface and higher memory RBS with enhanced memory bandwidth, which can be superior in Memory-bound operations including video editing, big data and so on.
Future-Proofing and Ecosystem Integration
When considering the M4 vs Intel Core Ultra 5 decision, it’s essential to think about future-proofing and ecosystem integration. The Apple M4 is developed as an ARM-based processor, so it represents a specific focus within the Apple ecosystem, with its best compatibility and specific optimization within macOS and the applications that are used within this operating system. That can be quite beneficial to the users, which are engaged in the Apple products list and who value the convenience of work with the Media application.
In contrast, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H itself, which is currently an x86 based processor, enjoys a huge amount of software and hardware compatibility. While x86 processors are efficient and powerful, there are many more old school systems and peripherals that are built for that architecture, offering more choice for designers who need specific interfaces for tools.
Making the Right Choice
Ultimately, the choice between the M4 vs Intel Core Ultra 5 depends on your specific needs and priorities. Free of competition with PC microprocessors, the main advantages of the apple M4 are – single core performance, efficiency, and compatibility with the devices within Apple’s ecosystem. However if you are more a gamer and need multithreading performance, a wider range of memory options, compatibility with a wide range of software applications the Intel Core Ultra 5 125H might be a better pick for you.
It’s always important to evaluate your workload needs, your budget, and your vision for future when making any purchase of technology. By carefully evaluating the strengths and weaknesses of each processor in the context of your specific needs, you can make an informed choice in the M4 vs Intel Core Ultra 5 debate and unlock the full potential of your computing experience.
